- #Batman arkham knight pc fixed yet 1080p
- #Batman arkham knight pc fixed yet serial
- #Batman arkham knight pc fixed yet skin
- #Batman arkham knight pc fixed yet windows 8.1
- #Batman arkham knight pc fixed yet series
Which is the worst part of it all: it's the franchise/ developer that gets hurt. I'm much less likely to buy whatever it is until well after release in the event that they pull a Batman on it now. While Shadow of Mordor will never have the broad appeal of the Batman games, I'm sure that there are quite a few (myself included) that are looking forward to what they decide to do with the Middle Earth franchise next. It would be sad to say that they're just greedy or just incompentent or just plain don't care but they've got a lot of titles that they put, at the very least, a minimal amount of effort toward making sure works well on all of the platforms they put them out on. When that blew up in their face they then decide to throw their hands in the air? And to repeat that pattern with a game that would have been universally praised as A++, 10/10, "Would buy again!" if not for this? That would have solidified whatever Rocksteady put out next as "Must buy" for just about everyone? That's shortsighted in the most egregiously stupid manner.
#Batman arkham knight pc fixed yet serial
Then they didn't even have the respect for the franchise (nevermind the purchasers) to keep development on the PC version in-house and handed it off to a serial contracting company that had done fuck-all on games of that magnitude and expectation. They ported Arkham City to the Wii U and made a browser game. First, instead of waiting on the company that demonstrated an ability to create a Batman game that worked to finish up their latest, they decide to pawn it off to a side developer that had done fuck-all. Again, here's a no-name game, brand new IP, that received solid attention to the quality of the PC version.Įven their Activision like tendencies, mostly their Midway properties of Mortal Kombat and Injustice, where the games aren't particularly new each time tend to be executed well. But it's a good instance of both of those with open-world zombie killing that was received very well. And, sure, it's a first-person parkour game well after no other AAA publisher attempted to out-do Mirror's Edge. Up next is their anti-Activision stance (occaisionally at least) with a game like Dying Light. In both cases these games had great reception on the PC, looking good and playing well. By all accounts Mad Max is nothing new but solid and Shadow of Mordor was a little new (the Nemesis system that worked incredibly well) but still very solid. Then there's WB's trend toward Ubisoft style design in the AAA space with making new AAA games variants on the Batman gameplay. There are how many of them now? 40+ over the last seven years? Yet, almost to a one, they manage to be solid games that, while doing nothing new, demonstrate Traveler's Tales ability to execute well on a solid concept and bring it to new non-Lego media franchises.
#Batman arkham knight pc fixed yet series
The Lego * series has to be the single most annualized entity in video gaming.
#Batman arkham knight pc fixed yet skin
Whereas Konami's just fuck awful (and have given up apparently), EA is straight up greedy, Ubisoft only makes one game with a new skin every year and Activision doesn't like to take chances leading them to run franchises into the ground WB seems to be able to sidestep all of those, in one way or another, but still burn loyal fans (but, ahh, they're just those "PC" playing fools) of their single biggest franchise. WB has to be one of the most schizophrenic companies in gaming. Probably these items belong in 3 different threads, but thoughts, links, and advice would be appreciated. I very comfortably can shoot a full-size double-stack. For what it's worth I have large but non-gigantic hands/fingers (e.g. I'm planning to get one, and was wondering if the general view was xbox, steam, or other? My favorite gamepad ever was probably the gamecube, and I have a pathological hatred for sony controls (compounded by their inane refusal to use non-hieroglyphic button nomenclature). Oh, and while it seemed surprisingly playable using a mouse, I get the feeling a gamepad is better. On that note, what I read seemed to indicate I'd get the bonus loot for their shitty release (recall it was a graphics card freebie), but haven't found anything that looked concrete. I've had fun with it overall hadn't played the previous ones.
#Batman arkham knight pc fixed yet 1080p
I'm playing at 1080p with a slight increase in the suggested settings. I did experience one issue during the cloudburst or whatever fight that brought things down to the 2-3 fps range, but restarting the machine fixed it. Now it's broadly acceptable to me (30-60 fps during action I grew up having to shrink the window size in Doom to make it playable so my tolerance in single player games for bits of slowdown is higher than most). The OS, witcher 3, and this take up my paltry ssd.Īt release I had bad frame rates only in the car.
#Batman arkham knight pc fixed yet windows 8.1
Due to a stupid VPN client issue at work I'm stuck on windows 8.1 for a bit. Some reasonably fast i5, nvidia 970 with which I got this and witcher 3 free, and a paltry 8 gigs of ram.